Effect of light attenuation through veneers on bond strength of adhesives with photoinitiator combinations

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the effect of light attenuation through ceramic veneers and resin cement on degree of conversion (DC), cohesive strength (CS), and microshear bond strength (μSBS) of experimental adhesive systems. Experimental etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives were combined with different ratios of camphorquinone (CQ) and diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (TPO) photoinitiators: CQ-only; 3CQ:1TPO; 1CQ:1TPO; 1CQ:3TPO and TPO-only. Square-shaped ceramic veneer (IPS Empress Esthetic, Ivoclar Vivadent) (n = 10; 10mm long x 10mm wide x 0.5mm thick) and resin cement specimens (Variolink Esthetic LC, Ivoclar Vivadent) (n = 10; 10 mm long x 10 mm wide and 0.3 mm thick) were prepared. Light transmittance of a multiple-peak LED (Bluephase G2, Ivoclar Vivadent) was measured through restorative materials using a spectrometer (n = 5). Adhesive specimens were analyzed for DC, CS, and μSBS by light-curing the adhesive with or without (control) ceramic veneer, and with resin cement fixed to output region of the light-curing tip (n = 10). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Total light transmittance through the restorative materials was attenuated, and this attenuation was more evident for the violet spectrum. The DC for the TPO groups in ratios up to 1CQ:1TPO was similar to the control. 1CQ:3TPO showed lower values for CS. μSBS was reduced for all groups with light attenuation, but lower values were observed for 1CQ:3TPO and TPO-only. In conclusion, light transmission was reduced with interposed restorative materials. Adhesives combined with CQ and TPO up to 1CQ:1TPO showed greater cure efficiency and mechanical properties compared with a higher amount of TPO.

Evaluation of the Light Intensity Emitted by the Light-curing Devices of a Dental School Clinic in the North of Brazil: a Pilot Study / Avaliação da Intensidade de Luz Emitida Pelos Fotopolimerizadores de uma Clínica-Escola da Região Norte do Brasil: um Estudo-Piloto

Photoactivated composite resins are among the most widespread restorative materials in dentistry, particularly in cosmetic dentistry. To obtain the best properties of the material, the resins must have their polymerization reaction initiated by means of the light-curing device, which activates the photoinitiators present in the composites. For this process to occur in the desired way, it is essential that the light-curing device emits light at the intensity necessary to properly activate the photoinitiators. Thus, a pilot study was carried out to assess the light intensity emitted by the light-curing devices used in a school clinic. To assess the light intensity emitted by the devices, a radiometer was used. Twentyfour light-curing devices were evaluated, 13 Optilight Max devices, 8 Optilight LD MAX 440 devices, 3 Emitter C. devices. All the devices had an emitted light below 400 mW / cm² and 67% of the devices had intensity above 300 mW/cm². The average light emission values of the light-curing devices were Optilight Max 334mW/cm², Emitter C 275mW/cm², Optilight LD MAX 440 296mW/cm². It was concluded that no light-curing device emitted light at the recommended intensity (400 mW/cm²), two thirds of the devices emitted light in intensity above the minimum required for photopolymerization of composite resin increments of up to 2mm and one third emitted light in intensity below the required minimum. There was no difference among the light-curing device models tested in this study. (AU)

As resinas compostas fotoativadas estão entre os materiais restauradores mais difundidos em odontologia, particularmente na odontologia estética. Para obtenção das melhores propriedades do material, as resinas precisam ter sua reação de polimerização iniciada por meio do fotopolimerizador, que ativa os fotoiniciadores presentes nos compósitos. Para que esse processo ocorra da forma desejada, é fundamental que o fotopolimerizador emita a luz na intensidade necessária para ativar adequadamente os fotoiniciadores. Assim, foi realizado um estudo piloto para avaliadar a intensidade da luz emitida pelo fotopolimerizadores utilizados em uma clínica-escola. Para avaliar a intensidade da luz emitida pelos dispositivos, foi utilizado um radiômetro. Vinte e quatro fotopolimerizadores foram avaliados, 13 aparelhos Optilight Max, 8 aparelhos Optilight LD MAX 440, 3 aparelhos Emitter C. Todos os dispositivos tiveram a luz emitida em intensidade inferior a 400 mW/ cm² e 67% dos dispositivos apresentaram intensidade acima de 300 mW/cm². As médias de valores de emissão de luz dos fotopolimerizadores foram, Optilight Max 334mW/cm², Emitter C 275mW/cm², Optilight LD MAX 440 296mW/cm²Concluiu-se que nenhum fotopolimerizador emitiu luz na intensidade recomendada (400 mW/cm²), dois terços dos aparelhos emitiram luz em intensidade acima da mínima necessária para fotopolimerização de incrementos de resina composta de até 2mm e um terço emitiu luz em intensidade abaixo da mínima necessária. Não houve diferença entre os modelos de fotopolimerizador testados neste estudo.(AU)

Polywave And Monowave Light-Curing Units Effects On Polymerization Efficiency Of Different Photoinitiators / Efeito Da Unidade De Cura Por Luz Polywave E Monowave Na Eficiência De Polimerização De Diferentes Fotoiniciadores

Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize and correlate the absorption spectra of three photoinitiators [camphorquinone (CQ), diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine oxide (TPO) and phenylbis (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phosphine oxide (BAPO)], using second or third-generation light curing units (LCU), and to evaluate the degree of conversion and the physical properties of an experimental resin adhesive. Material and methods: Second-generation (Radii-cal® and Emitter D®) and third-generation (Valo® Cordless and Bluephase N®) LCU were assessed regarding spectrum and irradiance rate of emitted light. Also, the photoinitiators (CQ, TPO and BAPO) were characterized by a light absorption spectrum assessed by UV-Vis spectroscopy, degree of conversion and yellowing effect. Statistical analyzes considered two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. Results: BAPO presented higher reactivity compared to TPO. Regarding degree of conversion of the photoinitiators activated by different light-curing units, the Emitter D® device promoted a high degree of conversion. BAPO presented the highest yellowing effect values. Conclusions: The emission and absorption characteristics of the photoinitiators were different. The polymerization reaction activated by the second-generation light-curing unit was reduced when using an experimental resin with photoinitiator TPO, and the third-generation light-curing unit showed a higher polymerization potential regardless of the photoinitiator. (AU)

Objetivo: Caracterizar e correlacionar os espectros de absorção de três fotoiniciadores [canforoquinona (CQ), difenil 2,4,6-trimetilbenzil óxido de fosfina (TPO) e óxido de di (2,4,6-trimetilbenzil) difenil fosfina (BAPO)], com unidades de fotoativação (LCU) de segunda ou terceira geração, e avaliar o grau de conversão e as propriedades físicas de um adesivo experimental. Material e métodos: LCU de segunda geração (Radii-cal® e Emitter D®) e terceira geração (Valo® Cordless e Bluephase N®) foram avaliadas quanto ao espectro e taxa de irradiância da luz emitida. Além disso, os fotoiniciadores (CQ, TPO e BAPO) foram caracterizados por um espectro de absorção de luz avaliado por espectroscopia UV-Vis, avaliado o grau de conversão dos adesivos e efeito de amarelamento. A análise estatística empregada foi ANOVA duas vias e teste post-hoc de Tukey. Resultados: BAPO apresentou maior reatividade comparado ao TPO. Em relação ao grau de conversão dos fotoiniciadores ativados por diferentes aparelhos fotopolimerizadores, o dispositivo Emitter D® promoveu um alto grau de conversão. BAPO apresentou os maiores valores de efeito de amarelamento. Conclusões: As características de emissão e absorção dos fotoiniciadores foram diferentes. A reação de polimerização ativada pelas unidades de fotopolimerização de segunda geração foi reduzida com o uso de uma resina experimental com fotoiniciador TPO. As unidades de fotopolimerização de terceira geração apresentaram maior potencial de polimerização independentemente do fotoiniciador. (AU)

Influência de diferentes fotoiniciadores na resistência de união na dentina bovina / Influence of different photoinitiators on the bond strength in bovine dentin

em polímeros, resulta em propriedades mecânicas satisfatórias para a adesão. Alterações na formulação dos materiais resinosos têm sido propostas com intuito de solucionar os problemas relacionados à polimerização desses sistemas, desta forma, fotoiniciadores diferentes da canforoquinona e que relatam maior grau de conversão têm sido utilizados. No entanto, o uso inadvertido de sistemas adesivos associados a compósitos odontológicos com diferentes sistemas de fotoiniciadores pode ocasionar uma redução na eficicácia da polimerização e, como consequência, da resistência adesiva. O objetivo deste estudo in vitro foi avaliar a influência dos fotoiniciadores na resistência à microtração de sistemas adesivos e resinas compostas na dentina bovina. Quarenta fragmentos dentais, com superfícies em dentina planificadas e lisas, obtidos da face vestibular coronária de incisivos bovinos hígidos, foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em 4 grupos experimentais (n=10) de acordo com os diferentes sistemas adesivos e resinas compostas utilizados: Grupo AAPS + VAPS (Ambar APS + Vittra APS); Grupo AAPS + O (Ambar APS + Opallis); Grupo A + VAPS (Ambar + Vittra APS); Grupo A + O (Ambar + Opallis). Após restauração com compósito, as amostras foram seccionadas para obtenção de palitos que foram submetidos ao teste de microtração (1,0 mm/min). Os dados obtidos foram submetidos à análise estatística. O teste de Kruskal-Wallis revelou não haver diferenças significativas entre os grupos (p<0,05). Valores em MPa foram: AAPS + VAPS - 19,56 MPa; AAPS + O - 19,77 MPa; A + VAPS - 17,78 MPa; A + O - 22,44 MPa. O resultado do teste de Mann-Whitney mostrou não haver diferenças significativas em função do adesivo (Ambar Universal- 19,11 MPa, Ambar APS Universal- 21,70 MPa) e da resina composta utilizada (Vittra APS- 18,75 MPa, Opallis- 23,75 MPa). Concluiu-se que a utilização de diferentes fotoiniciadores na composição dos sistemas adesivos e compósitos restauradores não influenciou seus valores de resistência adesiva devido à padronização dos fatores que influenciam o padrão de polimerização dos mesmos. (AU)

An effective polymerization of the composite resin provides a higher monomer degree conversion into polymers, resulting in satisfactory mechanical properties for adhesion. Changes in the formulation of resinous materials have been proposed with the aim to solve the problems related to the polymerization of these systems. Thus, different photoinitiators from camphorquinone and that report higher degree of conversion have been used. However, the inadvertent use of adhesive systems associated with dental composites with different photoinitiators systems can lead to a reduction in the efficiency of the cure and, consequently, of the adhesive resistance. The objective of this in vitro was to evaluate the influence of photoinitiators on the microtensile strength of adhesive systems and composite resins to bovine dentin. Forty dental fragments with smooth and straightened dentin surfaces obtained from the coronary vestibular surface of healthy bovine incisors were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n = 10) according to the different adhesive systems and composite resins used: Group: AAPS + VAPS (Ambar APS + Vittra APS); Group: AAPS + O (Ambar APS + Opallis); Group: A + VAPS (Ambar + Vittra APS); Group: A + O (Ambar + Opallis). After composite restoration, the samples were sectioned to obtain sticks that were submitted to the microtensile test (1.0mm/min). The data were submitted to statistical analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant diferences between groups (p<0.05). Values in MPa were: AAPS + VAPS - 19,56 MPa; AAPS + O - 19,77 MPa; A + VAPS - 17,78 MPa; A + O - 22,44 MPa. The result of the Mann-Whitney test showed no significant statistical difference as a function of adhesives (Ambar Universal- 19.11 MPa, Ambar Universal APS - 21,70 MPa) and the composite resin used (Vittra APS - 18.75 MPa, Opallis - 23.75 MPa). It was concluded that the use of different photoinitiators in the composition of adhesive systems and restorative composites did not influence their adhesive strength values due the standardization of the factors that influence the curing pattern of the adhesive systems. (AU)

Effect of diphenyliodonium hexafluorphosphate in the yellowing and properties of experimental resin cements

Aim: The yellowing effect is undesirable and can occur in the dental restoration margins when light-cured resin cements containing camphorquinone as photoinitiator is used. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of diphenyliodonium hexafluorphosphate (DPI) in photoinitiator systems that contained different concentrations of camphorquinone (CQ) and dimethylamino ethyl benzoate (EDAB) on resin cements. Methods: A base (1:1) of bisphenol A diglycidyl methacrylate (BisGMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) was obtained, and 60wt% of glass fillers was added. Eight formulations were obtained: RC1 (0.5mol% CQ / 1mol% EDAB), RC2 (0.5mol% CQ / 2mol% EDAB), RC3 (1mol% CQ / 1mol% EDAB), RC4 (1mol% CQ / 2mol% EDAB), and RC5 to RC8, which contained the same bases plus 0.5mol% DPI. Experimental resin cements were evaluated by the degree of conversion (DC), L*a*b* color analysis, water sorption (WS) and solubility (S), flexural strength, and Elastic Modulus. The data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey's and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). Results: The combination of DPI and 0.5mol% CQ increased DC in RC6 and L* in RC5 without increasing the WS and a* b* values. CQ at 1mol% showed higher values of b* and lower values of a*, except for RC3. Groups with 2mol% EDAB showed higher DC. Conclusion: The addition of DPI reduces CQ, generating a decreased yellowing effect, while maintaining adequate properties in the resin cements, especially with 2mol% EDAB

Light curing in dentistry and clinical implications: a literature review

Abstract Contemporary dentistry literally cannot be performed without use of resin-based restorative materials. With the success of bonding resin materials to tooth structures, an even wider scope of clinical applications has arisen for these lines of products. Understanding of the basic events occurring in any dental polymerization mechanism, regardless of the mode of activating the process, will allow clinicians to both better appreciate the tremendous improvements that have been made over the years, and will also provide valuable information on differences among strategies manufacturers use to optimize product performance, as well as factors under the control of the clinician, whereby they can influence the long-term outcome of their restorative procedures.

Influence of Different Photoinitiators on Polymerization Kinetics and Marginal Microleakage in Restorations using Photopolymerizable Dental Composites

Objective: To evaluate the influence of four different photoinitiators on the polymerization kinetics and marginal microleakage in class V restorations using photopolymerizable dental composites. Material and Methods: Four photopolymerizable dental composites based on Bis-GMA (14.5 wt %), UDMA (6.5 wt %) and silanized filler particles (79 wt %) containing different photoinitiators were formulated. Camphorquinone (CQ)/amine, phenyl-propanedione (PPD), monoacylphosphine oxide (Lucirin® TPO) and bisacylphosphine oxide (Irgacure® 819) were used as photoinitiators. Sixteen intact human third molars were selected and divided into four groups. All teeth received class V cavity preparations in their buccal and lingual surfaces and were submitted to a dye leakage test. Data were independently analyzed for both enamel and dentin, and the results were assessed by a Kruskal-Walis test. The polymerization reactions of the four composites were evaluated by differential scanning calorimeter coupled with photocalorimeter accessory. Results: Lucirin® TPO presented the highest scores for microleakage in enamel, whereas the other photoinitiators have not demonstrated statistical differences. The lowest scores were obtained for PPD in dentin while the highest scores have been achieved by Irgacure® 819 and Lucirin® TPO. Photocalorimetric measurements demonstrated a correlation between polymerization reaction rate and marginal leakage, showing that faster reactions cause greater marginal leakage. Conclusion: Marginal microleakage scores in photopolymerizable dental composites can be greatly influenced by different types of photoinitiators through their distinct reaction rates.

Optimizing light-cured composite through variations in camphorquinone and butylhydroxytoluene concentrations

Abstract The use of a free-radical polymerization inhibitor, butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), and a common photo-initiator, camphorquinone (CQ), to reduce polymerization stress in dental composite was investigated in this study. Samples were prepared by mixing Bis-GMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA at a 1:1:1 ratio (wt%), and silanized borosilicate glass fillers at 70 wt% were added to form the composite. Sixteen groups of resin composite were prepared using combinations of four CQ (0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%) and four BHT (0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%) concentrations. For each group, six properties were tested, including flexural strength (FS), flexural modulus (FM), degree of conversion (DC), contraction stress (CS), stress rate, and gel point (GP). The effects of CQ and BHT combinations on each of these properties were evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's Protected Least Significant Differences test at the 5% significance level. Groups with low CQ and BHT showed moderate values for FS, FM, and CS with a 70% DC. Increasing the BHT concentration caused a decrease in CS and DC with an increase in GP values. Increasing the CQ content led to a steady increase in values for FS and FM. High CQ and BHT combinations showed the most promising values for mechanical properties with low stress values.

Influence of photoinitiators and light sources on the degree of conversion of experimental resin cements / Influência de fotoiniciadores e fontes de luz no grau de conversão de cimentos resinosos experimentais

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o grau de conversão (DC) de sete cimentos resinosos experimentais formulados com diferentes fotoiniciadores, quando ativados por duas fontes luminosas (LCUs) atravessando a cerâmica. Material e Métodos: Sete formulações foram preparadas com diferentes concentrações (em peso) de Canforoquinona (CQ) e/ou Fenilpropanodiona (PPD): C5: 0,5% CQ; C8: 0,8% CQ; P5: 0,5% PPD; P8: 0,8% PPD; C1P4: 0,1% CQ e 0,4% PPD; C4P1: 0,4% CQ e 0,1% PPD; e C4P4: 0,4% CQ e 0,4% PPD. Cada mistura foi carregada com 65% em peso de partículas de carga silanizada. Foram usadas duas fontes luminosas para a fotoativação: uma de luz halógena de quartzo-tungstênio (QTH) e uma de diodo emissor de luz (LED). A irradiância (mW/cm²) foi calculada pela potência média de saída dividida pela área da ponta do aparelho. DC foi obtido por espectroscopia de infravermelho transformada de Fourier. Os dados foram submetidos a ANOVA 2-Fatores e ao teste de Tukey (5%). Resultados: Os valores de DC não exibiram diferenças significativas para LCUs, independente do tipo de fotoiniciador. O maior DC foi observado para o cimento P8, e o menor para C5. Valores intermediários de DC foram observados nos demais cimentos. No entanto, quando usado QTH, P8 diferiu dos cimentos C1P4, C4P1 e C5; e quando o LED foi empregado, P8 diferiu apenas de C4P1 e C5. Conclusão: Portanto, PPD é uma alternativa viável para o desenvolvimento de cimentos resinosos fotoativados, e a associação PPD/CQ também pode ser viável, uma vez que C4P4 foi semelhante a P8.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) ofseven experimentalresin cements formulated with different photoinitiators when activated by two light-curing units (LCUs) through ceramic material. Material and Methods: Seven resin blends with different camphorquinone (CQ) and/or phenyl propanedione (PPD) ratios were prepared: C5: 0.5% wt CQ; C8: 0.8% wt CQ; P5: 0.5% wt PPD; P8: 0.8% wt PPD; C1P4: 0.1% wt CQ and 0.4% wt PPD; C4P1: 0.4% wt CQ and 0.1% wt PPD; and C4P4: 0.4% wt CQ and 0.4% wt PPD. Each mixture was loaded with 65% wt of silanized filler particles. For photoactivation procedures, two LCUs were used: a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) and a light emitting diode (LED). Irradiance (mW/ cm²) was calculated by the ratio of the output power by the area of the tip. DC was assessed by Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Data were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%). Results: DC values do not show significant differences for LCUs regardless of the photoinitiator type. The highest DC was found for experimental cement P8 and the lowest for C5. Intermediate DC values were found for the other cements. However, when QTH was used, P8 exhibited differences among C1P4, C4P1 and C5; whereas when LED was used, P8 differed only for C4P1 and C5. Conclusion: Thus, PPD is a viable alternative for the manufacture of photoactivated cements, and the PPD/CQ association may also be viable since C4P4 was similar to P8.

Photoelastic evaluation of the effect of composite formulation on polymerization shrinkage stress

We compared polymerization stress in two commercial composites and three experimental composites made using camphorquinone (CQ) and/or phenylpropanedione (PPD) as photoinitiators. The internal surfaces of photoelastic resin discs with cylindrical cavities were roughened and treated with adhesive. Composites were divided into five groups: two commercial composites (Filtek Silorane and Filtek Z250) and three experimental composites with CQ/amine, CQ/PPD/amine, and PPD/amine. Composites were photopolymerized inside cavities, and subjected to photoelastic analysis immediately and at 24 hours and 7 days later using a plane polariscope. Stress created by Silorane (3.08 ± 0.09 MPa) was similar to that of Z250 (3.19 ± 0.13 MPa) immediately after photopolymerization (p > 0.05). After 24 hours and 7 days, Z250 (3.53 ± 0.15 and 3.69 ± 0.10 MPa, respectively) showed higher stress than Silorane (3.19 ± 0.10 and 3.16 ± 0.10 MPa, respectively). Qualitative analysis immediately after photopolymerization showed composite/CQ promoted higher stress than PPD, but stress levels at other evaluated times were statistically similar, varying between 3.45 ± 0.11 MPa and 3.92 ± 0.13 MPa. At 24 hours and 7 days, Silorane created the lowest stress. All photoinitiators created comparable tensions during polymerization.